Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Purple dragon, Devil and Merchant Prince, deathcap, arms of Zobeck, Raven wings, English scribe, black blood, Arabian Caliph, Jiro Logo, Eagle Ludwigs, Codex Red and Blue, Arabian Knife Fight, Coat of Arms Rooster and Bear, Golden Sun & Star, Green light, Book of Kells lettering, maps, Blue griffon, Genie, Ghouls, Medusa, Scáthsidhe, D&D 4E logo, Fetch cheese!, KQ Logo, Dire sheep, blood calligraphy, blood, Heraldry Germany, Council of 12, Nicolas Logue, Open Design Logo 2, OD Green Logo, Last call clock, Kobold
I never quite know which project is going to pull off the upset.

Way back when, I was sure that the Lost City was going to win, and Angels of Our Better Nature, and pretty much every time, I'm wrong. So... I shouldn't be surprised to see that now it's Wrath of the River King, the project that doesn't begin until July and that uses a GSL I haven't seen, that is drawing patron attention. It is just 15 patrons behind Tales of Zobeck, in fact.

And why not the 4E contender? If the Wrath of the River King commission is funded before the Tales of Zobeck/Courts of the Shadow Fey, I will write that one first. The paranoid side of me is convinced that patrons just want to see me flail around with a new format/ruleset/design parameters. "Wrath" would certainly involve a lot of that, as I'll be ramping up in a hurry.

Donate for Tales of Zobeck
Donate for Court of the Shadow Fey
Donate for Wrath of the River King

In other news, I've posted the first design essay for new project (or, if you prefer, another in the continuing series of Blood of the Gorgon design essays). This one is about encounter design, and especially about non-standard encounters. Patrons, give it a look and tell me what you think!

UPDATE: There seems to be some confusion about what I mean by writing Wrath first if it is commissioned first. It won't prevent Tales or Court of the Shadow Fey from moving ahead, but I can only write one project at a time, really. So, the first project to be commissioned gets more of my attention in June/July/August, but both will be written for the patrons who support them.

Tags:

Comments

[info]innercaine wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 04:26 pm (UTC)
Whoohoo!
I didn't mean to upstage Tales or Shadow Fae.. but some of us made a concerted effort to recruit for Wrath. I'm glad to see it paid off!
[info]rpgadamd wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 04:53 pm (UTC)
Caine's recruiting worked on me.
I never heard about open design before yesterday, but it intrigues me so much I signed up right away for Wrath. I’m looking forward to 4E and the chance to get in on the ground floor of a new edition.
[info]krell1 wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 05:26 pm (UTC)
Bummer, I have no 4E interest at all. With the exact nature of the license and the 'poison pill' provision I'm surprised that people would be willing to back it sight unseen. Alas, if this comes to fruition I'll take my wife out to dinner with return of my donation. However, if that's what the majority of people want Wolfgang should give it to them.
[info]99bullets wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 11:17 pm (UTC)
krell, I am withya.
I am interested as a player and DM in having a medium for having fun in a consistent game.

To me (and no offense guys/gals) the whoile 4E shtick appeals to the same folk who get a kick out of every new mobile phone launch.

Give me good stories translated into a good game mechanic (which works) and focus on adventures and not splat

eek! soapbox, sorry!
(no subject) - [info]krell1 - May. 7th, 2008 11:34 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]99bullets - May. 7th, 2008 11:47 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]trevorstamper - May. 9th, 2008 01:08 am (UTC) Expand
[info]jagdell wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 05:32 pm (UTC)
I don't think we really want to trip you with some new crunch (no really, Nemesis silliness aside), it's just we are very excited about 4e and want to be able to discuss/learn it with you at the same time.

Hell, you really have 3.5 down pat, isn't it time for a new challenge?

That's why I transfered my GSL money to Wrath.

[info]eyebite79 wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 05:51 pm (UTC)
I Hope We See Both
I really like both Wrath and Tales. Ideally, I would like to see them both commissioned at the same time. Madness, I know. But, I contributed to both.

In any event, I hope we see them both eventually.

At this point however, I really hope Zobeck takes it. It's Zobeck's time. Wrath can be done when the GSL and rulebooks are out, and we've all had time to kick the tires a little.

I'm firmly in the "wait and see" camp for 4e. I know there is this mad dash to get into 4e as soon as possible, but why not wait until we all have *some* grasp of the rules so we can more thoughtfully contribute to the development of Wrath?
[info]innercaine wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 05:58 pm (UTC)
Re: I Hope We See Both
I really like both Wrath and Tales. Ideally, I would like to see them both commissioned at the same time. Madness, I know. But, I contributed to both.

Agreed.. lest I be misunderstood, I am supporting both projects, and didn't seek to steal any support from one to the other.

And actually I am in the wait and see camp too.. However, after pre-ordering the set of bundled core books from Amazon, it didn't seem much more to spend $30.00 too see how a professional works the new system. One might never get another chance like this.
Re: I Hope We See Both - [info]krell1 - May. 7th, 2008 06:08 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: I Hope We See Both - [info]open_design - May. 7th, 2008 06:17 pm (UTC) Expand
Wolfgang Baur and the Open Design Kids - [info]innercaine - May. 7th, 2008 06:56 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Wolfgang Baur and the Open Design Kids - [info]krell1 - May. 7th, 2008 11:24 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Wolfgang Baur and the Open Design Kids - [info]krell1 - May. 8th, 2008 12:01 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]terraleon wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 06:15 pm (UTC)
Re: I Hope We See Both
Likewise, in that I'd like to see both developed and I'm hoping that putting the 4E engine in Wolfgang's hands might inject more RP elements than the vibe I'm getting now...

And I'm hoping that through the development process I gain a better understanding of the overall 4E system, shortcut the longer term process that seems to happen at the table.

-Ben.
[info]open_design wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 06:16 pm (UTC)
Re: I Hope We See Both
I'm definitely not saying that the 4E project means the 3E material won't be written, but I am saying that I'll start writing the one that is commissioned first.

Both will go ahead this year, just a matter of priority.
[info]wills4223 wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 07:51 pm (UTC)
I have no interest in 4E so I hope it doesn't hit the commission. I would hate to have all that time wasted. I really hope that the project that wins is a project I can use.
[info]innercaine wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 08:02 pm (UTC)
Ah, but they aren't mutually exclusive!
(no subject) - [info]wills4223 - May. 7th, 2008 08:25 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]innercaine - May. 7th, 2008 08:40 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]open_design - May. 7th, 2008 08:42 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]innercaine - May. 7th, 2008 08:46 pm (UTC) Expand
...some negative thoughts... - [info]chefseehund - May. 7th, 2008 08:49 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: ...some negative thoughts... - [info]wills4223 - May. 7th, 2008 09:44 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: ...some negative thoughts... - [info]99bullets - May. 7th, 2008 11:22 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]avidreader514 wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 08:34 pm (UTC)
This is an unexpected development...
...largely because I through Wrath was going to be written one way or another, and that patrons were only buying access to the design discussion, not patron-only exclusivity.

Defenders of Zobeck! Your enemy is the River King!
[info]open_design wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 08:44 pm (UTC)
Re: This is an unexpected development...
Wrath is being written either way. However, if it is fully funded before Zobeck/Shadow Fey is, it seems only fair that I start writing Wrath first. In that case, it's the 3E project that is written more in the Fall.

Frankly, I'm not clear WHY the level of 4E support is so high when the game isn't out yet. Maybe the WotC marketing is working after all. Maybe there's a larger cadre of 4E fans than I've seen at Open Design before.

For the record, there's ZERO patron exclusivity on Wrath, other than discussion and design essays. But frankly, I expect that may be the most entertaining part.

Edited at 2008-05-07 08:45 pm (UTC)
Re: This is an unexpected development... - [info]99bullets - May. 7th, 2008 11:24 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]avidreader514 wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 11:14 pm (UTC)
Re: This is an unexpected development...
"...thought Wrath was going to be written..."

I couldn't let that typo stand. What happened to my Edit button, dagnabbit?
[info]darkthorne68 wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 11:05 pm (UTC)
Goal Tracking?
Would it be possible to track what % you are at to meet your goals for each product? That way if the 4E supporters want to see Wrath happen they could either donate more, coerce a few friends etc. The same would work for the 3X modules. Consider it incentive as it were. Also on a side note can you elaborte on the Zero Patron exclusivity on Wrath?
Also for the record I am a Wrath 4E supporter
[info]open_design wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 11:45 pm (UTC)
Re: Goal Tracking?
Sure, I'll put something like that up, er, soon.

About the zero exclusivity, I just mean that "Wrath" is not a limited edition.

Edited at 2008-05-07 11:46 pm (UTC)
[info]davidei wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 11:40 pm (UTC)
Non-use of OGL as part of GSL agreement
Hi Wolfgang -

Just wanted to let you know that I've signed up for Zobeck, with the option of having my donation go toward the Shadow Fey adventure if that wins (unlikely). Like some of the others, I'm unwilling to put money on a 4E adventure before I own the rulebooks and know what to expect (or what I even want).

I am wondering, however, if the recent announcement by WotC that a company which produces books using the GSL cannot continue to produce books that use the 3.5 system affects Open Design?
[info]open_design wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 11:49 pm (UTC)
Re: Non-use of OGL as part of GSL agreement
Yep, I totally appreciate and respect that 3E work is going to continue to be part of the Open Design landscape. As a freelancer, I really can't afford to piss off partisans on either side of the Edition Wars.

There were some WotC clarifications to their GSL announcement that seem to imply that a company can produce both, as long as they are in separate product lines. No word yet on how product line is defined, but I'm taking suggestions on what to name the 4E line.

Though, probably best to take suggestions from 4E fans. :)
[info]coffeesucker wrote:
May. 8th, 2008 01:25 am (UTC)
Zobeck...or nothing
My money is on Zobeck and if Wrath beats it out, well then, that's bucks back in my pocket. I've said this on a half-dozen or more forums and I'll say it again: NOT...GONNA...SUPPORT...4E!
I'm with a few others > I hope WoTC loses its ass on 4E. I haven't supported any of their products for years and don't plan to do so again.
Paizo, Sinister Adventures, Kobold Quarterly, and OD has my support...as long as they do not convert to 4E. If they do, then I'll be done with them too.
No hard feelings to anyone - just stating the facts from where I'm sitting.
-g-
Re: Zobeck...or nothing - [info]innercaine - May. 8th, 2008 02:47 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Zobeck...or nothing - [info]coffeesucker - May. 8th, 2008 09:52 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Zobeck...or nothing - [info]innercaine - May. 8th, 2008 10:12 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Zobeck...or nothing - [info]trevorstamper - May. 9th, 2008 01:19 am (UTC) Expand
[info]funkbgr wrote:
May. 8th, 2008 04:18 am (UTC)
I picked Wrath
People haven't seen 4e, it comes out June 6th.

I don't understand how people can write 4e off, sight unseen. Preview material or not, you can't judge it until you've got it in your hands.

That's why I signed up for Wrath - I want to read about the process, and see what's different (or isn't different). I think it'll help me make a more informed decision in the long run about what I want in a game, and which edition is best to present that.
Re: I picked Wrath - [info]trevorstamper - May. 9th, 2008 01:24 am (UTC) Expand
Re: I picked Wrath - [info]99bullets - May. 9th, 2008 08:15 am (UTC) Expand
Re: I picked Wrath - [info]coffeesucker - May. 9th, 2008 09:54 am (UTC) Expand
[info]elijahsnow1 wrote:
May. 9th, 2008 12:12 pm (UTC)
I am happy to wait patiently for 3.5e Tales/Shadow Fey (preferably both).

However, I am not going to patronize 4e products, no matter how cool the designers are.
(no subject) - [info]open_design - May. 9th, 2008 05:34 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]elijahsnow1 - May. 9th, 2008 05:41 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]open_design - May. 9th, 2008 05:50 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]elijahsnow1 - May. 9th, 2008 05:53 pm (UTC) Expand
To Elijahsnow1 - [info]innercaine - May. 9th, 2008 08:31 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]bullonir wrote:
May. 9th, 2008 05:12 pm (UTC)
Zobeck it is for me!

As they: Your cheque is in the mail!
:)
Patrick
(no subject) - [info]open_design - May. 9th, 2008 05:32 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]bullonir wrote:
May. 10th, 2008 01:19 am (UTC)
If Zobeck loses (sigh), please count me in for those Fey thingies :)

BTW Wolfgang,
Any way to put this automatically into the choices for the next OD: If choice No 1 is not chosen, please apply my contribution to No 2.

It might make your job easier...

Patrick
[info]avidreader514 wrote:
May. 10th, 2008 02:36 am (UTC)
Voting is Fun!
Wow, this instance of direct democracy has turned into a bigger hairball than usual. Wolfgang, I believe I owe you a truck of the headache remedy of your choice for the trouble.
Re: Voting is Fun! - [info]open_design - May. 10th, 2008 10:05 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]terraleon wrote:
May. 10th, 2008 06:31 am (UTC)
I also posted an announcement of the 3.5 OD projects to enworld's press section...just so Tales/Court gets the same notice (hopefully) that Wrath picked up.

-Ben.
(no subject) - [info]open_design - May. 10th, 2008 10:03 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]bullonir - May. 12th, 2008 02:23 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]trevorstamper - May. 13th, 2008 01:16 am (UTC) Expand